------- Comment #15 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 16:36 ------- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #12) > > COMMON symbols don't cause members to be pulled in from library archives. > > You > > can omit "-L. -lex" from the final link altogether and get the same result: > > it's unused. So the reference from bug.o to _jindx2 doesn't cause the > > library > > archive member to be drawn into the final link. > > > > Comment #1 seems to contradict your assertion here. To repeat, > > laptop:kargl[207] gfc4x -c a2.f > laptop:kargl[208] ar -cru libex.a a2.o > laptop:kargl[209] gfc4x -o z a1.f -L. -lex > laptop:kargl[210] ./z > chars=abcdeabcdeabcdeabcdeabcde > *missingBlockData* loaded common block
I can't tell anything from that. What is gfc4x, and what are a1.f and a2.f? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42568
