http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744

--- Comment #33 from Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> 2011-07-18 16:52:59 
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #32)

> Is isn't too bad:
> 
> 5182.95user 396.13system 15:32.41elapsed 598%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
> 362556maxresident)k

My check on unloaded SNB (using current mainline at r176403, default configure
flags and make -j 8) was in favor of patched gcc:

(unpached)

real    28m40.314s
user    154m2.612s
sys    8m16.934s

vs:

(patched)

real    27m8.057s
user    142m42.522s
sys    7m41.875s

> It passed SPEC CPU 2K and I am running SPEC CPU 2006 now.  Can
> you check in your patch? Thanks.

Will do.

Please also note, that there is no need for new lea_x32 patterns anymore.

Reply via email to