http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744
--- Comment #33 from Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> 2011-07-18 16:52:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #32) > Is isn't too bad: > > 5182.95user 396.13system 15:32.41elapsed 598%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata > 362556maxresident)k My check on unloaded SNB (using current mainline at r176403, default configure flags and make -j 8) was in favor of patched gcc: (unpached) real 28m40.314s user 154m2.612s sys 8m16.934s vs: (patched) real 27m8.057s user 142m42.522s sys 7m41.875s > It passed SPEC CPU 2K and I am running SPEC CPU 2006 now. Can > you check in your patch? Thanks. Will do. Please also note, that there is no need for new lea_x32 patterns anymore.
