http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744
--- Comment #34 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-07-18 16:55:35
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #33)
>
> Please also note, that there is no need for new lea_x32 patterns anymore.
My x32 branch has
2011-07-18 Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com>
PR target/47744
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_decompose_address): Allow only subregs
of DImode hard regs in PLUS chains.
2011-07-17 H.J. Lu <hongjiu...@intel.com>
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_decompose_address): Don't support
32bit address in x32 mode.
2011-07-17 H.J. Lu <hongjiu...@intel.com>
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_fixup_binary_operands): Revert x32
change.
2011-07-17 H.J. Lu <hongjiu...@intel.com>
* config/i386/i386.md (*lea_0_x32): Removed.
(*lea_2_x32): Likewise.
(*lea_2_zext_x32): Likewise.
(X32 LEA zero-extend split): Likewise.
2011-07-17 Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com>
PR target/47744
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_decompose_address): Properly handle
SUBREG for x32.
2011-07-17 H.J. Lu <hongjiu...@intel.com>
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_simplify_base_index_disp): Removed.
(ix86_decompose_address): Don't call it.
