[Bug tree-optimization/53647] [4.8 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/20011229-1.c and gcc.c-torture/compile/pr25311.c

[wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53647

William J. Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2012-06-12
          Component|target                      |tree-optimization
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
                   |gnu.org                     |
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #10 from William J. Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> 
2012-06-12 20:30:46 UTC ---
OK, after looking at these machine descriptions I think we will have to
tolerate a line size of 0.  They appear to be for the ancient 386 chips that
didn't have onboard cache, and sometimes no offboard cache.  So I'll go ahead
and make the fix.