http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56243



--- Comment #3 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-23 10:42:55 UTC ---

(In reply to comment #2)

> Any news on this bug?  It's one of only a few P1 regressions left.



This bug triggers with --enable-checking on the constexpr stuff. I was looking

at it yesterday, and tried to fix it in the same way than you fixed PR53816. It

did work, but it caused a regression on constexpr-static10.C which I didn't

manage to resolve yet. If I fail to find out what goes wrong this week-end, I

will probably have to defer to someone more involved than me on the constexpr

stuff.



I didn't check if it was a regression wrt 4.7 with --enable-checking

Reply via email to