https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66714

--- Comment #22 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #21)

> How about 
> 
> +             else
> +               gcc_unreachable ();
> 
> ?
> 
> That makes sure you run into all the unhandled cases.

Good idea. Unfortunately, that caused 4696 new unexpected failures. Maybe some
of those value exprs are VAR_DECLs. I'll investigate this tomorrow.

> > I tested this patch in gomp-4_0-branch libgomp and everything appears to
> > work. Does this issue present in trunk too?
> 
> Yep, this PR was originally filed as gomp-4_0-branch PR but, I changed it to
> trunk PR at comment 13.

Thanks. I'll check out trunk.

Reply via email to