https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66714
--- Comment #22 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to vries from comment #21) > How about > > + else > + gcc_unreachable (); > > ? > > That makes sure you run into all the unhandled cases. Good idea. Unfortunately, that caused 4696 new unexpected failures. Maybe some of those value exprs are VAR_DECLs. I'll investigate this tomorrow. > > I tested this patch in gomp-4_0-branch libgomp and everything appears to > > work. Does this issue present in trunk too? > > Yep, this PR was originally filed as gomp-4_0-branch PR but, I changed it to > trunk PR at comment 13. Thanks. I'll check out trunk.