https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80191
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Martin, that might be nice for IDEs too, which can presumably aren't restricted to using a single font like most terminals. (In reply to Roland Illig from comment #2) > But then shouldn't it be spelled "new-initializer", not "new initializer"? It's still clearly related to the same thing, even without the hyphen. At the very least, "new" shouldn't be translated, because it refers to the C++ keyword, which is always spelled "new" and not "neu" or "nouveau" or anything else. It's an initializer for a new-expression, not an initializer that is newer than some other initializer.
