https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80536
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #11) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > > To expand on that, I think we want to drop that call from there and instead > > be able to simplify somehow a SAVE_EXPR if after c_fully_fold or cp_fold it > > becomes simple enough not to require any saving. > > Hmm, I'm not sure what you mean. save_expr has > > 3351 if (tree_invariant_p_1 (inner)) > 3352 return expr; Sure, it has and also has skip_simple_arithmetic. But without the fold there is a chance (though small, as fold isn't recursive) that it previously would turn something non-invariant/simple arithmetics into invariant/simple arith and we wouldn't create the SAVE_EXPR, but now do. Besides increased memory footprint that wouldn't be bad, the problem is that I don't see any of the recursive folders being able to undo that, so we end up with them until gimplification. Thus, it would be nice if e.g. cp_fold, or fold, or c_fully_fold_internal was able to fold a SAVE_EXPR where: inner = skip_simple_arithmetic (TREE_OPERAND (save_expr, 0)); if (TREE_CODE (inner) == ERROR_MARK) return inner; if (tree_invariant_p_1 (inner)) return TREE_OPERAND (save_expr, 0); The problem on the C FE side (that would be nice to fix) is that it has its own c_save_expr that wants the operand to be c_fully_folded already when creating the SAVE_EXPR, it would be better if we could post-pone that and perhaps use some flag on the SAVE_EXPR to indicate whether we've c_fully_folded the operand already or not and only fully fold it once (C++ FE does that through its hash maps) the first time something calls c_fully_fold on the SAVE_EXPR. So maybe you should start just with the C++ FE for now, or do it in fold too.