https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84146
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Untested fix:
--- gcc/config/i386/i386.c.jj 2018-01-31 09:26:18.341505667 +0100
+++ gcc/config/i386/i386.c 2018-01-31 14:13:33.815243832 +0100
@@ -2609,31 +2609,27 @@ rest_of_insert_endbranch (void)
for (insn = BB_HEAD (bb); insn != NEXT_INSN (BB_END (bb));
insn = NEXT_INSN (insn))
{
- if (INSN_P (insn) && GET_CODE (insn) == CALL_INSN)
+ if (CALL_P (insn))
{
if (find_reg_note (insn, REG_SETJMP, NULL) == NULL)
continue;
/* Generate ENDBRANCH after CALL, which can return more than
twice, setjmp-like functions. */
- /* Skip notes and debug insns that must be next to the
- call insn. ??? This might skip a lot more than
- that... ??? Skipping barriers and emitting code
- after them surely looks like a mistake; we probably
- won't ever hit it, for we'll hit BB_END first. */
+ /* Skip notes that must immediately follow the call insn. */
rtx_insn *next_insn = insn;
- while ((next_insn != BB_END (bb))
- && (DEBUG_INSN_P (NEXT_INSN (next_insn))
- || NOTE_P (NEXT_INSN (next_insn))
- || BARRIER_P (NEXT_INSN (next_insn))))
- next_insn = NEXT_INSN (next_insn);
+ if (NEXT_INSN (insn)
+ && NOTE_P (NEXT_INSN (insn))
+ && (NOTE_KIND (NEXT_INSN (insn))
+ == NOTE_INSN_CALL_ARG_LOCATION))
+ next_insn = NEXT_INSN (insn);
cet_eb = gen_nop_endbr ();
emit_insn_after_setloc (cet_eb, next_insn, INSN_LOCATION (insn));
continue;
}
- if (INSN_P (insn) && JUMP_P (insn) && flag_cet_switch)
+ if (JUMP_P (insn) && flag_cet_switch)
{
rtx target = JUMP_LABEL (insn);
if (target == NULL_RTX || ANY_RETURN_P (target))
@@ -2668,7 +2664,7 @@ rest_of_insert_endbranch (void)
if ((LABEL_P (insn) && LABEL_PRESERVE_P (insn))
|| (NOTE_P (insn)
&& NOTE_KIND (insn) == NOTE_INSN_DELETED_LABEL))
-/* TODO. Check /s bit also. */
+ /* TODO. Check /s bit also. */
{
cet_eb = gen_nop_endbr ();
emit_insn_after (cet_eb, insn);