https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930
--- Comment #25 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930 > > --- Comment #22 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > It also causes failures on AArch64. > > > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/reduc_2.c > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/slp_7.c > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/slp_5.c At least for this one there's the comment /* ??? At present we don't treat the int8_t and int16_t loops as reductions. */ but I guess it's the same for the rest. You have to fixup the testcases yourself - they are too complex and fragile. > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/reduc_1.c > > I've also noticed a few ICEs on SPEC but haven't pinpointed it to this commit > yet. Running a bisect. Might be PR92205, I'm testing a patch for that.
