https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930
--- Comment #26 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > At least for this one there's the comment > /* ??? At present we don't treat the int8_t and int16_t loops as > reductions. */ > > but I guess it's the same for the rest. You have to fixup the testcases > yourself - they are too complex and fragile. Ah yeah fair enough. Thanks! > > I've also noticed a few ICEs on SPEC but haven't pinpointed it to this > > commit > > yet. Running a bisect. > > Might be PR92205, I'm testing a patch for that. Ah yeah it's that one. Thanks. I just noticed it so didn't get a chance to find an existing report. I'll follow that one. Thanks!
