https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> --- On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 07:44:16PM +0000, jvdelisle at charter dot net wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255 > > --- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at charter dot net --- > (In reply to kargl from comment #2) > > This issue depends on the fix for FORALL. In gfc_match_do in the concurrent > > section, one gets to > > > > m = match_forall_header (&head, &mask); > > > > to match the control portion of the statement. > > Although we need to support forall, it is interesting that the standards > committe i going to deprecate it, if they have not done so already. Not > encouraged to be used for sure. Also they will be adding features to DO > CONCUURENT which look useful to me. > do current (JUNK HERE) forall (JUNK HERE) The JUNK HERE is parsed by the same code; namely, match_forall_header(). So, if one fixes do current, then one fixes forall. PS: J3 has an interesting discussion that suggests that do current is also broken.
