https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at charter dot net --- (In reply to kargl from comment #2) > This issue depends on the fix for FORALL. In gfc_match_do in the concurrent > section, one gets to > > m = match_forall_header (&head, &mask); > > to match the control portion of the statement. Although we need to support forall, it is interesting that the standards committe i going to deprecate it, if they have not done so already. Not encouraged to be used for sure. Also they will be adding features to DO CONCUURENT which look useful to me.
