https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95188
--- Comment #11 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #10) > Created attachment 49293 [details] > supergraph Thanks. Compared to my testing, I'm seeing what appear to be differences in the inputs to the analyzer at the gimple level, which are likely due to differences in the rest of the compiler. Is this with the same version of gcc as in comment #4, where you said "gcc (GCC) 11.0.0 20200916 (experimental)". You don't happen to know exactly which revision, do you? [The md5sum of the bzip2.c I'm using is 23f66348f80345353d5b5b98e299ff15. There could also be differences in the system headers, I suppose]
