https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95188
--- Comment #12 from Mark Wielaard <mark at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #11) > (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #10) > > Created attachment 49293 [details] > > supergraph > > Thanks. Compared to my testing, I'm seeing what appear to be differences in > the inputs to the analyzer at the gimple level, which are likely due to > differences in the rest of the compiler. > > Is this with the same version of gcc as in comment #4, where you said "gcc > (GCC) 11.0.0 20200916 (experimental)". > > You don't happen to know exactly which revision, do you? I am afraid I don't know exactly. I have been experimenting with having DWARF 5 as default in my builds, which is another difference. > [The md5sum of the bzip2.c I'm using is 23f66348f80345353d5b5b98e299ff15. > There could also be differences in the system headers, I suppose] The MD5 matches. But I am indeed using system headers from RHEL7 with DTS9 installed to bootstrap my GCC builds.
