https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103088
--- Comment #18 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #17) > > I don't mind closing this as invalid, however this isn't a known limitation, > > it's a new limitation. > > Yes, it may be a new limitation or we may be affected by the same issue by > now for ref size. Yes, which is why I had asked for us to confirm[1] that the reason for the failure is valid since the failure appeared on a non-math related patch :) If Aldy is happy that the threader is correct here I'm happy with that. The previous failures were well understood. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103088#c11