https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108177
--- Comment #1 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- I noticed that for SVE stores seem to be marked as volatile memory accesses, I suspect it's because they are represented using masked stores which probably are by definition volatile (for this reason?). A fix for this for now, before MVE starts using maskedstore patterns, would be to use unspec_volatile for such stores.
