https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106671
--- Comment #12 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jiangning Liu from comment #11) > Hi Wilco, > > > "it means we will need a linker optimization to remove those redundant BTIs > > (eg. by changing them into NOPs)" > > It will be only for performance optimization, right? If we don't care about > performance, the linker doesn't need to optimize it to be NOP, right? It > could still be useful if we only do this operation for a specific module. no, this is a security feature, we want as few BTI c in an executable segment as possible.
