https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111334
--- Comment #19 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to chenglulu from comment #18) > This problem has been fixed on LA664． > I don't quite understand why this operation is still needed in !TARGET_64BIT? It's not needed with !TARGET_64BIT. I just meant I didn't added TARGET_64BIT because the diff was only for a quick discussion.
