https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118623
--- Comment #2 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Changing it to:
```
int a, b;
int c(int f, int g) {
for (int d = 0; d <= 4; d++) {
int e = 1 << f;
if (g & e)
return d;
}
return 5;
}
int h(int f, int g) {
if ((c(g - 50, g) + g + g) & 1);
else if (f)
a = 1;
return a;
}
int main() {
if (h(b + 5, b + 63) != 0)
__builtin_abort();
return 0;
}
```
it works at -O3.
