On 06/03/2015 09:29 AM, Tom Tromey wrote:
I did not realize that myself before. I do not think there is an
easy fix for the GCC patch, is it?
It seems like a VLA would work.
Right. It doesn't seem like a big stretch to me either.
Jeff> 99% of the time I've used a constant with the @ syntax in gdb.
I use a non-constant argument to @ quite a bit.
It's common to have something like the struct hack where the length of
the array is stored in the struct. Then when scripting gdb one can
write:
print s.array[0] @ s.length
Which is case that I've had use for a non-constant RHS as well. I just
haven't had to use it all that much.
Jeff
