On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Jeff Law wrote: > Well, there's not *that* many qsort calls. My quick grep shows 94 and > its a very mechanical change. Then a poison in system.h to ensure raw > calls to qsort don't return.
Any suggestion for the non-poisoned replacement? xqsort? gcc_qsort? Can you review the rest (the substantial functionality) of the patch without waiting for the mass-renaming change? Thanks. Alexander
