On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Jeff Law wrote: > >> Well, there's not *that* many qsort calls. My quick grep shows 94 and > >> its a very mechanical change. Then a poison in system.h to ensure raw > >> calls to qsort don't return.
Note that poisoning qsort outlaws vec::qsort too; it would need to be mass- renamed as well (to vec::sort, presumably). It seems there are 83 or more calls to vec::qsort. > > Any suggestion for the non-poisoned replacement? xqsort? gcc_qsort? > qsort_chk/qsort_nochk for checked and non-checked? I believe qsort_chk isn't appropriate, checking is not explicitly a part of interface, and we never use _chk in potentially-checking tree and RTL accessors either. Thanks. Alexander