On 08/02/2017 12:00 PM, Alexander Monakov wrote: > On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Jeff Law wrote: >> Well, there's not *that* many qsort calls. My quick grep shows 94 and >> its a very mechanical change. Then a poison in system.h to ensure raw >> calls to qsort don't return. > > Any suggestion for the non-poisoned replacement? xqsort? gcc_qsort? qsort_chk/qsort_nochk for checked and non-checked?
> > Can you review the rest (the substantial functionality) of the patch > without waiting for the mass-renaming change? I think the rest is good as-is. If we find a need to adjust the checking intervals, then we can do that as a follow-up. jeff
