On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 14:59 -0500, Peter Bergner via Gcc-patches wrote:
> This patch adds the testsuite test cases for all of the MMA built-
> ins.
>
> This patch plus patch1 and patch2 passed bootstrap and regtesting
> with no
> regressions on both powerpc64le-linux and powerpc64-linux. Ok for
> trunk?
>
> Peter
>
> 2020-06-15 Peter Bergner <berg...@linux.ibm.com>
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> * gcc.target/powerpc/mma-builtin-1.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/mma-builtin-2.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/mma-builtin-3.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/mma-builtin-4.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/mma-builtin-5.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/mma-builtin-6.c: New test.
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/mma-builtin-1.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/mma-builtin-1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..a971c869095
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/mma-builtin-1.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,313 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_future_ok } */
> +/* { dg-options "-Wno-psabi -mdejagnu-cpu=future -O2" } */
> +
Compared the tests with scan-assembler stanzas, tests look reasonable.
Per the previous patches, the -mma option comes with -mcpu=future
option automatically, so thats good.
I think it would be good to have an additional test or two to verify
the -mma and -mno-mma options behave as desired, but that could be a
later add-on.
otherwise lgtm.
Thanks
-Will
