On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 07:56:56PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Sun, 23 Apr 2023, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > 1) Targets that already always have LRA, but that redefine the hook > > anyway. These are gcn, pdp11, rx, sparc, vax, and xtensa. Nothing > > really changes for these targets with this patch (but later patches > > will delete the superfluous hook implementations). > > Umm, no, VAX has LRA selectable and for a reason it defaults to off:
I read TARGET_LRA as something that denotes LRA is selected :-) See the other mail. So, vax is in category 2). > There are extra ICEs in regression testing and code quality is poor; cf. > <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-January/588296.html>. Do you have something you can show for this? Maybe in a PR? And, are the ICEs in the generic code, or something vax-specific? Segher
