> >>>> This looks pretty reasonable to me.  Are there any patches left in
> >>>> this series that need review?  I'm very much looking forward to
> >>>> build time provements related to this patch, particularly for
> >>>> targets that I bootstrap with qemu emulation -- we take multiple
> >>>> hours to build gimple-match and the ability to parallelize those
> >>>> component
> >> builds should be a significant win.
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> No this is the last one, Richi already approved the rest but he
> >>> didn't feel he had enough knowledge about the build system to say if
> >>> this code was portable enough.
> >>
> >> I'm looking forward to this going as well for improved bootstrap
> >> times, thanks for working on this!
> >>
> >>>
> >>> So just waiting on this one and can commit the series.
> >>
> >> Can we treat Jeff's LGTM above as an ok given his global reviewer position?
> >
> > Ah I didn't treat it as such as it wasn't in reply to the "ok for
> > master" part. But perhaps I misunderstood.  In case it wasn't, this is
> > also a PING for the *.in files maintainers.
> My message was a fairly ambiguous.   I just gave it another once over
> and I'll give an explicit OK for the trunk.
> 

Merci!

I'll go to the next bottleneck then.

Thanks!
Tamar

> Jeff

Reply via email to