On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 09:04:16AM -0600, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On 5/5/23 08:59, David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > This patch has broken GCC bootstrap on AIX. It appears to rely upon, or
> > complain about, the command "seq":
> >
> > /nasfarm/edelsohn/install/GCC12/bin/g++ -std=c++11 -g -DIN_GCC
> > -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall
> > -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-format
> > -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wconditionally-supported -Woverloaded-virtual
> > -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings
> > -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE -static-libstdc++
> > -static-libgcc -Wl,-bbigtoc -Wl,-bmaxdata:0x40000000 -o build/genmatch \
> > build/genmatch.o ../build-powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0/libcpp/libcpp.a
> > build/errors.o build/vec.o build/hash-table.o build/sort.o
> > ../build-powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0/libiberty/libiberty.a
> > /usr/bin/bash: seq: command not found
> > /usr/bin/bash: seq: command not found
> > build/genmatch --gimple \
> > --header=tmp-gimple-match-auto.h --include=gimple-match-auto.h \
> > /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/match.pd
> >
> > All of the match files are dumped to stdout.
> Sigh. So the question is do we make seq a requirement or do we implement an
> alternate to get the sequence or implement a fallback.
We require GNU make, so perhaps we could use something like
$(wordlist 1,$(NUM_MATCH_SPLITS),$(check_p_numbers))
instead of
$(shell seq 1 $(NUM_MATCH_SPLITS))
provided we move the check_p_numbers definition earlier (or perhaps bettter
rename
it to something more generic, so that it is clear that is a variable holding
numbers from 1 to 9999.
Jakub
