On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 03:42:21PM -0400, David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches wrote: > Hi, Drew > > Thanks for addressing this missed optimization. > > The testcase includes an incorrect assumption: signed char, which > causes the testcase to fail on PowerPC. > > Should the testcase be updated to specify signed char in the function > signatures or should -fsigned-char be added to the command line > options?
I think we should use signed char instead of char in the testcase. Jakub