> Yes, it's better to call it one_quad.
I'd suggest to go with quarter as before or quarter_width_op or something. >> Is this necessary for recognizing a different pattern? > > Are you saying that the testcases xxx-1 and xxx-2 are duplicated? If > so, I have no problem removing it and just keeping xxx-1 testcase > since it is still possible to cover my code. I was just curious why the NEW_TYPE bi = b[i] was necessary instead of using b[i] directly. Regards Robin
