On Jan 17, 2013, at 5:05 PM, rbmj <r...@verizon.net> wrote: > On 05-Jan-13 23:18, rbmj wrote: >> On 06-Dec-12 10:14, rbmj wrote: >>> On 26-Nov-12 13:27, rbmj wrote: >>>> On 11/13/2012 10:22 PM, rbmj wrote: >>>>> On 11/5/2012 12:57 PM, rbmj wrote: >>>>>> This removes warnings about implicit declarations and fixes one of the >>>>>> function calls in vxlib-tls.c for vxworks targets. >>>>>> >>>>>> I got the old prototypes from >>>>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-08/msg01314.html >>>>>> >>>>>> See bug for further details. >>>>>> >>>>>> Someone please comment or commit :) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ping: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg00406.html >>>>> >>>>> Robert Mason >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Ping^2 >>>> >>> Ping^3? >>> >> >> Ping^4? >> > Dare I ping^5?
You are now entered into the most ignored and most trivial gcc patch contest. You presently are behind the leader, but, if you can get another 10 pings in before approval, you can win! Good luck.
