On Wed, 17 Sep 2014, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > On Wed, 17 Sep 2014, Janne Blomqvist wrote: > > Oops, I forgot to update some parts in an #ifdef branch that isn't > > taken on my target. I'll try to find time to fix it later tonight. If > > you're in a hurry, just replace > > > > fstrcpy (iqp->name, iqp->name_len, u->file, u->file_len); > > > > with > > > > cf_strcpy (iqp->name, iqp->name_len, u->filename); > > > > in inquire.c. > > Thanks, build completes and I'll commit the following as obvious > if there are no regressions.
Since there are 25 related regressions, not committed. There must be something else amiss too. (Maybe you can find it on your platform by artificially disabling HAVE_TTYNAME && HAVE_TTYNAME_R.) +gfortran.sum gfortran.dg/f2003_inquire_1.f03 +gfortran.sum gfortran.dg/inquire.f90 +gfortran.sum gfortran.dg/inquire_13.f90 +gfortran.sum gfortran.dg/inquire_15.f90 +gfortran.sum gfortran.dg/inquire_16.f90 +gfortran.sum gfortran.dg/inquire_6.f90 +gfortran.sum gfortran.dg/inquire_7.f90 +gfortran.sum gfortran.dg/inquire_9.f90 +gfortran.sum gfortran.dg/inquire_size.f90 +gfortran.sum gfortran.dg/large_unit_1.f90 +gfortran.sum gfortran.dg/large_unit_2.f90 +gfortran.sum gfortran.dg/negative_unit.f +gfortran.sum gfortran.dg/negative_unit_int8.f +gfortran.sum gfortran.dg/open_negative_unit_1.f90 +gfortran.sum gfortran.dg/pr20950.f +gfortran.sum gfortran.dg/streamio_10.f90 +gfortran.sum gfortran.dg/streamio_16.f90 +gfortran.sum gfortran.dg/streamio_3.f90 +gfortran.sum gfortran.dg/streamio_8.f90 +gfortran.sum gfortran.dg/unf_io_convert_4.f90 +gfortran.sum gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/inquire_1.f90 +gfortran.sum gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/inquire_2.f90 +gfortran.sum gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/inquire_3.f90 +gfortran.sum gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/inquire_4.f90 +gfortran.sum gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/inquire_5.f90 brgds, H-P
