On Thu, 18 Sep 2014, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:57 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson <h...@bitrange.com>
> wrote:
> > 'k so we'll track the regressions in a PR.
>
> Do you prefer to tack on to 62768 or a new PR?
Hijacking 62768 for the purposes of reporting a regression for
its fix would not be proper.
> Note that the r215338 fix only applies when using
> INQUIRE(...NAME=...), so I don't think manually disabling
> HAVE_TTYNAME{_R} helps in finding the cause of the regressions, while
> I haven't gone through every testcase you mentioned none of the few
> ones I did check inquired for the name. So there must be something
> else. Can you check where it's actually failing? Is it failing the
> testcase (call abort() ) or is there a segfault etc.?
Will tell in a new PR, unless I see a really obvious fix.
> I suggest trying
> e.g. gfortran.dg/inquire.f90 which is quite a simple testcase.
Thanks.
brgds, H-P
