Excerpts from Thomas Schwinge's message of Dezember 16, 2022 3:10 pm: > > In the test suites, a number of existing test cases explicitly match the > "command-line option [...] is valid for [...] but not for [...]" > diagnostic with 'dg-warning'; I've left those alone. On the other hand, > I've changed 'dg-prune-output' of this diagnostic into > '-Wno-complain-wrong-lang' usage. I'm happy to adjust that in either way > anyone may prefer. I've not looked for test cases that just to silence > this diagnostic use more general 'dg-prune-output', 'dg-excess-errors', > '-w', etc. > > In the GCC/D test suite, I see a number of: > > cc1plus: warning: command-line option '-fpreview=in' is valid for D but > not for C++ > > cc1plus: warning: command-line option '-fextern-std=c++11' is valid for D > but not for C++ > > It's not clear to me how they, despite this, do achieve > 'PASS: [...] (test for excess errors)'? Maybe I haven't found where that > gets pruned/ignored? >
There's an implicit dg-prune-output inserted by the gdc-convert-test proc. As the only tests that mix C++ and D sources is the runnable_cxx part of the testsuite, I can add the flag to the D2 testsuite scripts later just for those tests. Iain. -- Gcc-rust mailing list Gcc-rust@gcc.gnu.org https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-rust
