On Tue, 17 May 2005, Hugh Sasse wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2005, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > [...] > > shortly. All those posted (at least this month) seem to get posted with > > subject lines which do not match the normal form produced by test_summary > > and so don't get so readily found by my script which counts how many test > > results postings there are for different versions and targets. For > > example, [Example *very* trimmed -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > comparison to 4.1.0 20050416 (experimental)". Ensuring your test results > > use the standard Subject header format makes it more likely they can > > handled properly by sites processing the gcc-testresults postings into > > Is this standard documented (where?), please? I ask because the > script that generates these has few comments, so it's a little > difficult to know what will break when 'meddling' :-) with it.
It's a de facto standard: don't modify your Subject header from that test_summary generates; there are plenty of examples on gcc-testresults of what the headers should look like. You can rewrite the shell script output by test_summary - all the test summaries sent by CodeSourcery Automatic Testing System rewrite the script to control the From address - but preserve the subject header when you do so or when you send the summary manually. -- Joseph S. Myers http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (CodeSourcery mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)
