DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> if (OPT_Wmissing_braces) >> warning (OPT_Wmissing_braces, "missing braces around >> initializer"); > > FYI OPT_Wmissing_braces is an enum constant; it will always be nonzero.
So, I assume this patch is wrong in this regard: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-06/msg00392.html >> [3] >> warning (OPT_Wmissing_braces, "missing braces around initializer"); > > That is what we decided to do. > > Note, however, if the logic required to determine if a warning is > warranted is sufficiently complex, *also* checking the variable is > considered an optimization: OK, thanks! -- Giovanni Bajo
