Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> writes: > On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 05:16:19PM +0200, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: >> >> >> > Am 09.05.2023 um 14:16 schrieb Florian Weimer via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>: >> > >> > TL;DR: This message is about turning implicit-int, >> > implicit-function-declaration, and possibly int-conversion into errors >> > for GCC 14. >> >> I suppose the goal is to not need to rely on altering CFLAGS but change the >> default behavior with still being able to undo this using -Wno-error= or >> -Wno-? > > Can't people just compile C89/K&R code with -std=c89/-std=gnu89 and not get > these errors that way?
This is what we've been doing for hopeless projects and it's probably my preference, but I'm fine with Florian's -fpermissive suggestion too. (The point about inline semantics is important but you can handle that with other flags anyway.) best, sam
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
