* Richard Biener: >> Am 09.05.2023 um 14:16 schrieb Florian Weimer via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>: >> >> TL;DR: This message is about turning implicit-int, >> implicit-function-declaration, and possibly int-conversion into errors >> for GCC 14. > > I suppose the goal is to not need to rely on altering CFLAGS but > change the default behavior with still being able to undo this using > -Wno-error= or -Wno-?
That's what Clang does (and the defaults chang along with -std= settings). To me, -Werror by default for some warnings seems rather hackish. But that's just my personal preference, I do not have a strong objection to doing it that way. One downside with -Wno- is that some developers jump on this rather quickly instead of fixing the real problem. So far, I've seen this in both Chromium and the kernel, in fringe areas admittedly, but still. The advantage is that there is a familiar workaround to get things compiling quickly again, of course. > I think instead of hard-coding a set of changes would it be possible > to alter the default setting of diagnostic options during GCC > configuration? And maybe even note that when diagnosing? I'd be worried about our package maintainers if we do something like that. We'd like them to report build failures upstream, and if it's just one or two distributions doing that and not GCC upstream, well, I guess we just got a preview of how some upstreams are going to react. Package maintainers tend to be volunteer or junior engineering roles, I think, so this doesn't seem fair to me. Thanks, Florian
