Hi Dave,
Tests related to our plugin which depend on Python-specific
definitions have been run by including /* { dg-options "-fanalyzer
-I/usr/include/python3.9" } */. This is undoubtedly not ideal; is it
best to approach this problem by adapting a subset of relevant
definitions like in gil.h?
Best,
Eric
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 1:06 PM David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-08-01 at 09:57 -0400, Eric Feng wrote:
> > >
> > > My guess is that you were trying to do it from the
> > > PLUGIN_ANALYZER_INIT
> > > hook rather than from the plugin_init function, but it's hard to be
> > > sure without seeing the code.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks Dave, you are entirely right — I made the mistake of trying to
> > do it from PLUGIN_ANALYZER_INIT hook and not from the plugin_init
> > function. After following your suggestion, the callbacks are getting
> > registered as expected.
>
> Ah, good.
>
> > I submitted a patch to review for this feature
> > on gcc-patches; please let me know if it looks OK.
>
> Thanks Eric; I've posted a reply to your email there, so let's discuss
> the details there.
>
> Dave
>
