On Fri, 2024-07-05 at 17:53 +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> At least, I hope there's consensus that while current GCC doesn't warn
> about this, ideally it should, which means it should warn for valid uses
> of strtol(3), which means strtol(3) should be fixed, in all of ISO,
> POSIX, and glibc.

It **shouldn't**.  strtol will only violate restrict if it's wrongly
implemented, or something dumb is done like "strtol((const char*) &p,
&p, 0)".

See my previous reply.

-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry...@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University

Reply via email to