Thomas Koenig via Gcc <[email protected]> writes: > Am 01.08.26 um 21:00 schrieb Sam James: >>> What happens if a patch contains a non-trival amount of code that >>> cannot be copyrighted because it was assisted by AI? >> The open questions around this are why the GNU project issued >> provisional guidance to reject significant contributions developed with >> an LLM. >> If it is copyrightable, then who owns the copyright? If it's based >> on >> the training data, then the contributor may not have the rights to >> share such a patch, and it cannot be legally redistributed under the GPL >> (or any licence). > > That is one of the clearer points right now - LLM-generated code cannot > be copyrighted.
Again, the GNU project guidance was to wait. Anyway, if this is the case, you can launder any GPL project.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
