On 2/14/06, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the last few days, many of the key obstacles to a 4.1 release were > removed, including, but not limited to: > > 1) The -mlong-double-128 patches have gone in. > 2) Jason fixed some RVO issues. > 3) Michael fixed the zero-width bitfield vs. #pragma pack issue. > > Unfortunately, there are still two PRs for regressions that I think > merit P1: > > PR26258: wrong code caused by incorrect alias analyis.
This is now fixed on both the branch and the mainline. > PR26209: an ICE-on-valid for simple C++ code, from Boost, using a > pointer-to-member. > > We could argue about PR26209, but I thin PR26258 is too embarrassing to > have in a release. Fortunately, a patch has been posted for PR26258, > and Richard G. claims to have a patch for PR26209. I guess you meant 26258, the patch for 26029 is by Zdenek and still lacks a review: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg00933.html Richard.