address order and BB numbering

[sean yang]

Although "BASIC_BLOCK array contains BBs in an unspecified order" as the GCC 
internal doc says, can I assume that the final virtual address for an 
instruction in BB_m is always higher than the virtual address for an 
instruction in BB_n, when m < n.  (Let's assume the linker for the target 
machine produce code from low address to high address.)

It seems to be rigth to me. Just curious.
Thanks,

_________________________________________________________________
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® 
Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963