Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-22 11:36]: >> I'm a bit torn. On the one hand, it doesn't look like there is any >> other reason to do a 4.1.1 RC2. > > Did anyone investigate those abi_check failures I (and others) have > seen? See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-05/msg01058.html
Yes, I asked the libstdc++ list, and Paolo C. says that they result from using a slightly different configuration from the configuration used to generate the baseline. -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 331-3385 x713
