"It is of course not a threat to point out that anything you post here will be permanently associated with your name for ever, and that there is no way to undo this. This is just a statement of fact."
There is always a way of undoing things, it's simply a matter if you want to do so or not, and in this case clearly not. I don't see any reason why this conversation will be listed by just mailing a couple e-mailaddresses which I contacted before numerous times and no one responded for the simple reason they don't want to. Just delete all e-mailaddresses and state clearly that once posted it can not be undone. I'm almost sure that your practices are against the laws of privacy. Tomorrow I will check this out, as a matter of fact I already did. You have no right to publish things without permission. If all this crap is ever to be published, no one will believe, gnu.org is simply making itself ridiculous by publishing this. I just got another mail from Christopher Faylor, which "threatens" to block me from sending mail, why not, once again so much freedom... There isn't even freedom of speech here. Do I continue until I'm blocked? --- Robert Dewar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did not mean my message at all as a threat, but > just as some helpful advice. Note that it was sent > only to you, not to the list. It is normally not a > good idea to post such private messages to a public > list without permission (and may indeed violate > copyright, though that's not clear). For sure it is > a violation of netiquette, so you add that to your > record here. > > I respond to the list here just to make it clear > that I did not post the message to the list. > > It is of course not a threat to point out that > anything you post here will be permanently > associated with your name for ever, and that > there is no way to undo this. This is just a > statement of fact. > > In our modern day and age, people will often google > a name to find out more about someone, and when they > do that, all your old posts will appear. Again, > that's > not a threat, just a statement of a fact that should > be clear to anyone posting on any list. > > Alexander Verhaeghe wrote: > > Go ahead threatening people, it's all what you > > accomplished so far! You say "Are you really > sure", I > > don't even have the chance to say yes or no, so > much > > freedom! > > > > That e-mail of $300 I will keep just in case... > > > > --- Robert Dewar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Are you really sure you want the below message to > be > >> permanently associated with your name, it is now > .. > >> and this association can never be removed. I > think > >> you should think before posting any more messages > >> that will follow you around. > >> > >> Alexander Verhaeghe wrote: > >>> "Free as in Freedom" in > >>> http://www.gnu.org/home.html#ContactInfo > >>> > >>> You're not even able to remove a couple of > >> messages, > >>> so how "free" am I now? > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wanted $300 for removal! > >>> How "free" am I now? You should be ashamed of > >>> yourselves! > >>> > >>> Not only privacy is not respected, > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> also threatened that more hits would be > generated > >> in > >>> the archives, [EMAIL PROTECTED] shouldn't do > >> that, > >>> it's against privacy in case you didn't realize! > >>> > >>> > __________________________________________________ > >>> Do You Yahoo!? > >>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > >> protection around > >>> http://mail.yahoo.com > >> > >> > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
