On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 06:59:42PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > I'd rather simply fix glibc to work with C99 inline semantics. For the > above you might use > > #define tolower(c) __tolower_inline(c) > static __inline __attribute__((__always_inline__)) int tolower_inline ... > > and #undef tolower when defining the out of line function. That would > apply to all cases where a user-visible function in a header is currently > inlined directly; for a purely internal function in the header, we can > arrange for all declarations to use "inline" without "extern" when in C99 > mode.
Isn't the whole point that the current extern inline isn't __always_inline__, but leaves it to the compiler's judgement? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery
