Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > This all may just be a shakedown problem with MPFR, and maybe it will > > stabilize shortly. But it's disturbing that after one undistributed > > version became a requirement, we then very shortly stepped up to a new > > undistributed version. I think it should be obvious that if we > > require an external library which is not in the tree, we should not be > > at the bleeding edge of that library. > > I thought we were going from an unreleased version to the subsequent release.
As far as I know both versions are released. What I said was "undistributed," by which I mean: the required version of MPFR is not on my relatively up to date Fedora system. Ian
