On Tuesday, 31. July 2007, Volker Reichelt wrote: > Therefore, IMHO the patch is wrong and should be reverted. > Or am I missing something?
I don't have access to a newer version of the language standard either. I couldn't find a different case that is comparable to this one either (for example, we handle the difference between an enumerator list with a trailing ',' and a initializer list with a trailing ',' - although that is equally counter-intuitive). So, assuming that this hasn't changed in a newer standard then I guess you're right and the check should only be a warning with -pedantic, (and no -pedantic-errors) given. This is however not implementable currently. As I don't know why -pedantic-errors is on by default for C++ (but not for C), the only possibility I see is indeed to revert this patch and add a comment/testcase. Greetings, Dirk
