Dear Mr. Pizzaro, > Is not it easy to write 3 stages GENERIC->GIMPLE->RTL instead of 5 stages? > > Is meaningful the optimization of the complex bi-transformation > GIMPLE->SSA->GIMPLE? > > Is more powerful GENERIC->GIMPLE->RTL + "trial-and-error" local optimization? > > Sincerely, J.C. Pizarro
everyone else here is too polite to tell it to you, but could you please shut up, until: -- you learn at least basics of English grammar (so that we can actually understand what you are saying), and -- at least something about gcc and compilers in general (so that what you say makes some sense)? While I was mildly annoyed by your previous "contributions" to the discussion in the gcc mailing list, I could tolerate those. But answering a seriously ment question of a beginner by this confusing and completely irrelevant drivel is another thing. Sincerely, Zdenek Dvorak
