2007/10/22, Zdenek Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Mr. Pizzaro, > > > Is not it easy to write 3 stages GENERIC->GIMPLE->RTL instead of 5 stages? > > > > Is meaningful the optimization of the complex bi-transformation > > GIMPLE->SSA->GIMPLE? > > > > Is more powerful GENERIC->GIMPLE->RTL + "trial-and-error" local > > optimization? > > > > Sincerely, J.C. Pizarro > > everyone else here is too polite to tell it to you, but could you please > shut up, until: > > -- you learn at least basics of English grammar (so that we can actually > understand what you are saying), and > -- at least something about gcc and compilers in general (so that what > you say makes some sense)? > > While I was mildly annoyed by your previous "contributions" to the > discussion in the gcc mailing list, I could tolerate those. But > answering a seriously ment question of a beginner by this confusing > and completely irrelevant drivel is another thing. > > Sincerely, > > Zdenek Dvorak >
Dear Zdenek Dvorak, Why have i to shut up? Is it an order? What is the big problem when i talk about the weakness of such thing? Ahhh, it's a problem, then i shut up to solve this weakness's problem. Do you want it Dvorak? No problem man. J.C. Pizarro